Ridley v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
The Disciplinary Board of the State Bar has unanimously recommended that petitioner Cornell Ridley be disbarred, and he seeks in this proceeding to review the board’s recommendation.
Petitioner was admitted to practice in 1954. The only disciplinary action previously taken against him was a private reproval in 1965. On the basis of extensive evidence received at hearings before a local administrative committee in Los Angeles, the board found that between 1961 and 1968 petitioner had been guilty of professional misconduct in 10 matters.
In four cases, the board found, petitioner…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Corn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by31 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Martin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.