Reznik v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation by the State Bar Disciplinary Board that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years on conditions of probation, including actual suspension during the first year.
The recommended discipline is based upon petitioner’s professional misconduct during a civil action in seeking to mislead the court and opposing party for his own advantage, thus violating his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6067, 6068, 6103) and committing acts involving moral turpitude (Bus. & Prof. Code, §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Coviello v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Most v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Corn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lewis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.