Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Stump

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1980No. 4998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

The issue before us concerns determination of the appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed against W. Clark Stump.1

In proceedings before the Area Hearing Committee and the Disciplinary Board of the Alaska Bar Association, respondent W. Clark Stump admitted to all of the alleged acts of professional misconduct with which he was charged. More particularly, Stump admitted to violating the following provisions of Disciplinary Rule 1-102 of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

(A) A lawyer shall not:(3) Engage in illegal conduct involving moral…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Mosesian v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving SimpsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WestAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API