Legal Opinion

Himmel v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1971No. L.A. 29733PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year on conditions of probation including three months’ actual suspension.

Petitioner, who was admitted to practice in 1952, was charged in a notice to show cause with forging the name of a client, Gloria Bowers, to a check, commingling her funds with his own, converting her funds, and knowingly making a false representation to her. An answer filed by petitioner denied the charges.

The Evidence

Gloria Bowers (who was then Gloria…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Crooks v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API