Himmel v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year on conditions of probation including three months’ actual suspension.
Petitioner, who was admitted to practice in 1952, was charged in a notice to show cause with forging the name of a client, Gloria Bowers, to a check, commingling her funds with his own, converting her funds, and knowingly making a false representation to her. An answer filed by petitioner denied the charges.
The Evidence
Gloria Bowers (who was then Gloria…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Lee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Crooks v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.