Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Staar

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1996No. OSB 93-125; SC S42817PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536(3); Bar Rules of Procedure (BRs) 10.1 and 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed a formal complaint, alleging that the accused knowingly made false statements in a “Petition for Restraining Order to Prevent Abuse,” in violation of ORS 162.065 (perjury) and ORS 162.075 (false swearing). The Bar further alleged that the accused thereby violated Disciplinary Rules (DRs) 1-102(A)(2), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1 and 7-102(A)(5). 2 The Bar also alleged that the accused violated DR 1-103(C) 3 by failing to cooperate with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goger v. United States (In Re Janmar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GlassOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API