In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Staar
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is a de novo review of a lawyer disciplinary proceeding. ORS 9.536(3); Bar Rules of Procedure (BRs) 10.1 and 10.6. The Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed a formal complaint, alleging that the accused knowingly made false statements in a “Petition for Restraining Order to Prevent Abuse,” in violation of ORS 162.065 (perjury) and ORS 162.075 (false swearing). The Bar further alleged that the accused thereby violated Disciplinary Rules (DRs) 1-102(A)(2), 1-102(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), 1 and 7-102(A)(5). 2 The Bar also alleged that the accused violated DR 1-103(C) 3 by failing to cooperate with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goger v. United States (In Re Janmar, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GlassOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.