Legal Opinion
Wall v. Board of Regents, UC
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1940No. Civ. 12677PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Petitioner seeks an alternative writ of prohibition to prevent the board of regents of the University *699of the State of California from continuing the employment and the payment of the salary of one Bertrand Russell, who has been employed by the management of said university.
The Constitution of the State of California reposes in the regents of the university full powers of organization and government of the university, subject only to such legislative control as may be necessary to insure compliance with the terms of the endowments of the university and the security of its funds. (Art. IX, sec.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McFarland v. McCowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Building Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Merriman v. National Zinc Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fairchild v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- State ex rel. Richardson v. Board of RegentsNevada Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.