Legal Opinion
Burt v. Irvine Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1965No. Civ. 21701PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.
— Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment entered for the defendants after the court sustained the respective demurrers of each of two groups of defendants without leave to amend, and also from an order requiring plaintiffs to furnish security pursuant to the provisions of section 834 of the Corporations Code.
Procedural Background
A review of the proceedings held before the lower court facilitates understanding of the legal issues raised by the appeal and the factual matters, both alleged and evidentiary, bearing thereon. On July 31, 1962 plaintiffs filed their complaint, in two counts. The…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,000 Ora E. Gaines v. D. J. Haughton, Lois A. And James Fitzpatrick v. D. J. HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. StalderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.