Legal Opinion
Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Building Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1929No. Docket No. 3577PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This appeal was taken from á judgment which was rendered against the plaintiffs for failure to amend their pleading after a demurrer to the second amended complaint had been sustained.
The complaint is voluminous, comprising more than a hundred printed pages, but an epitome of its contents will suffice for the purpose of determining this appeal. The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are stockholders and creditors of the Cosmosart Realty and Building Corporation of Los Angeles; that Clark and Sherman Land Company was the owner of eighteen acres of land in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Gamble v. Queens County Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Dunphy v. Traveller Newspaper Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Rogers v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gaillard v. Natomas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Findley v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Beehan v. Lido Isle Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.