Legal Opinion
Merriman v. National Zinc Corp.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided January 28, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On final hearing on hill to set aside certain contracts.
1Opinion of the Court
Teaming. Y. C.
The bill is filed by a stockholder of the Sussex Calcite Company in behalf of that corporation to set aside two certain contracts made by that company with Eugene Howard, bearing date February 21st, 1908, and March 18tb, 1908, respectively. The rights of Howard under these contracts have been assigned to and are now held by defendant National Zinc Corporation.
These contracts were authorized by formal votes of the board of directors of the Sussex Calcite Company and at the next succeeding annual stockholders’ meeting of that company, held April 8th, 1908, were reported to and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Wall v. Board of Regents, UCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Riddle v. Mary A. Riddle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Whitfield v. KernNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Riddle v. Mary A. Riddle Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.