McFarland v. McCowen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
— This was an application in the court below by William McFarland, the respondent here, for a writ of mandate to compel appellant, auditor of the county of Mendocino, to issue two warrants to respondent upon the county treasurer for *330$149.25 and $244.85, respectively. The respondent was a constable of Mendocino County, and as such presented two claims for fees against the county to the board of supervisors for the above several amounts. The bills or claims presented were itemized accounts for constable fees for arresting criminals under warrants and for serving subpoenas iu criminal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. FreshourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Carroll v. SiebenthalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by28 opinions
- Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Mcconoughey v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- County of Alameda v. EversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McBride v. NewlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.