Legal Opinion
In Re Illuzzi
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 30, 1993No. 92-602PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is before us a second time. In In re Illuzzi, 159 Vt. 155, 159-60, 616 A.2d 233, 236 (1992), we held that DR 7-104(A)(l) (lawyer shall not communicate with a represented party without consent of party’s attorney) prohibits lawyers for plaintiffs from communicating directly with defendant insurance companies without the consent of the companies’ counsel. We remanded the case to the Professional Conduct Board because the Board “failed to adhere to the requirements of its procedural rules when it adopted a second hearing panel report that had not been submitted to respondent.” Id. at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- People v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- In Re O'DeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McCaffreyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Attorney CSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- In Re HunterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- In Re GadboisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.