In Re Attorney C
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
This case involves an important issue of first impression: namely, what are the parameters of a prosecutor's ethical duty to disclose exculpatory material to the defense under Colo. RPC 8.8(d)? We hold that Rule 8.8(d) requires prosecutors to disclose exeul-patory evidence to the defense in advance of any critical stage of the proceeding. The respondent 1 in these proceedings did not do so. However, we also hold that a prosecutor violates Rule 8.8(d) only if he or she acts intentionally. In this case, the hearing board did not find that the respondent acted intentionally. Therefore, we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In re Attorney F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- In Re FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. CorsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.