In Re Gadbois
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Respondent, Richard Gadbois, Esq., appeals the Professional Conduct Board’s decision that he violated the Code of Professional Responsibility: * DR 4-101(B)(3) (using a confidence or secret of a client for the advantage of another); DR 5-105(A) (accepting employment even though it would likely involve him in representing differing interests); and DR 1-102(A)(7) (engaging in conduct adversely reflecting upon fitness to practice law). Respondent argues on appeal that the Board erred in finding he violated any disciplinary rule and committed a number of procedural errors. We reach the merits and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- In Re HindsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- In re HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Adoption of EricaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- In re the Discipline of an AttorneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- In re AndresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Cody v. CodySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- In Re Norman E. Watts, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.