Legal Opinion

Stipcich v. Marinovich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1942No. 28504PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action to rescind a contract and for a money judgment. The complaint alleged facts as follows: On or about the 17th day of August, 1939, plaintiff and defendant entered into the following written agreement:

“Contract
“This Contract, made and entered into this 17 day of August 1939, by and between Anthony Marinovich hereinafter called Marinovich, and Frank Stipcich, hereinafter called Stipcich.
“Whereas, Marinovich now owns and operates a restaurant business known as the. California Oyster House, and—
“Whereas, Marinovich has possession of and title to a corporation known…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pollock v. RalstonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Purdy & Whitfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Vance v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gleason v. Metropolitan Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. Tripp v. ChubbArizona Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API