Legal Opinion

Vance v. Ingram

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1943No. 28813PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

— This is an appeal by plaintiff, Kathryn Vance, from a declaratory judgment entered in favor of L. P. Ingram and wife on April 9, 1942.

Plaintiff, an experienced skating rink operator, had an option to buy certain real estate located at Eighty-fifth and Fremont, in the city of Seattle. In addition, she owned equipment for a roller skating rink, such as skates, pipe organ, restaurant equipment, etc. In the summer of 1938, desiring to build a rink on the property referred to, plaintiff contacted the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, for the purpose of obtaining a loan, to be secured by a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Corr v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kavanaugh v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Standring v. MooneyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mead v. AntonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Byrne v. AckerlundWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Harbor Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Dix Steel Co. v. Miles Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brust v. McDONALD'S CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API