Causten v. Barnette
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered December 19, 1907, granting' plaintiff’s motion for a temporary injunction after a hearing upon affidavits and other, evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
This appeal is prosecuted from an order granting a temporary injunction restraining the defendants Barnette, Hill, and Wood from receiving or attempting to take or receive, and from in any way disposing of, transferring, assigning, cancelling, or hypothecating certain shares of' stock in the Gold Bar Lumber Company, represented by certificates issued by the company to Barnette, Wood, and Hill, and held by the Scandinavian-American Bank of Seattle, and also restraining the bank from surrendering the certificates. *661to said defendants. The defendants Barnette and Wood claim that such shares of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Reed v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway v. Denver and Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Vance v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Butler v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Call v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Henry v. LindWashington Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.