Cheesman v. Sathre
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This lawsuit grew out of a disagreement between two partners who jointly invented a hydraulic shock absorber device called a boomsnub, designed to prevent accidents caused by rigging failures on cranes equipped with heavy booms. The disagreement culminated in the execution by defendant partner of a licensing agreement purporting to convey to the other two defendants .here all right to manufacture and sell the device, for which an application f pr a patent was then pending.
Defendants have appealed from an eight thousand dollar judgment for plaintiff entered on a jury verdict.
Plaintiff sued for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Junkin v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Harrington v. RichesonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Anstine v. McWilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Corbit v. J. I. Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re LeviasWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- John Davis & Co. v. Cedar Glen Four, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.