Legal Opinion

Cheesman v. Sathre

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1954No. 32769PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This lawsuit grew out of a disagreement between two partners who jointly invented a hydraulic shock absorber device called a boomsnub, designed to prevent accidents caused by rigging failures on cranes equipped with heavy booms. The disagreement culminated in the execution by defendant partner of a licensing agreement purporting to convey to the other two defendants .here all right to manufacture and sell the device, for which an application f pr a patent was then pending.

Defendants have appealed from an eight thousand dollar judgment for plaintiff entered on a jury verdict.

Plaintiff sued for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Junkin v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Harrington v. RichesonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Anstine v. McWilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Corbit v. J. I. Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re LeviasWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. John Davis & Co. v. Cedar Glen Four, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API