Legal Opinion

Purdy & Whitfield v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1942No. 28470PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

On May 14, 1939, Willis H. Benham, a logger, was struck by a falling tree and died the next day. Mabel Benham, his divorced wife and the mother of his three minor children, filed a claim with the department of labor and industries seeking a pension for the children. Purdy & Whitfield, undertakers, filed a claim for services rendered in connection with Ben-ham’s funeral. The supervisor of the department rejected both claims on the ground that the deceased was not, at the time of his injury, a workman within the purview of the workmen’s compensation act. On rehearing, the joint board of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Beels v. Department of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Devlin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In Re Larsen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Penick v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Kilpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API