Legal Opinion

Toth v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1931No. Docket No. 373PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal. The motion is based on the ground that the appellant did not file its points and authorities within the time prescribed by the provisions of section 4 of rule I of the rules of this court. The transcript was filed on February 2, 1931. The time for appellant to file its opening brief expired, therefore, on March 4, 1931. Notice of the presentation of this motion w.as given by mail. The affidavit of mailing shows that a copy of the notice of motion, properly addressed to counsel for appellant, was deposited in the United States Post Office at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Connors v. SecordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tyner v. AxtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Jaques v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API