Legal Opinion

Tyner v. Axt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1931No. Docket No. 336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The motion is based on the ground that the appellant did not file his brief within the time permitted by the rules of the court. The transcript was filed on October 6, 1930. The time for appellant to file his opening brief expired, therefore, on November 5, 1930. Notice of the presentation of this motion was served and filed December 10, 1930. The motion was noticed for presentation on January 13, 1931, and was presented on that date. On December 12, 1930, appellant’s brief was filed. Appellant’s attorney has presented and filed an affidavit from which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Lisle v. RagleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API