Legal Opinion
Hall v. Wolford
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1937No. Civ. 1856PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for damages suffered by respondent while riding in an automobile owned and driven by Harold Wolford, an employee of Dolson & Anderson, Inc.
Respondent has made one motion for dismissal of the appeal because appellants’ briefs were not filed in time and another to dismiss the appeal of Wolford or affirm the judgment against him because the appeal by him was taken for delay only and the question presented by him is so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. (Sec. 3, rule V, Rules of the Supreme Court and District-Courts of Appeal.)
Separate briefs were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Barr v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Southern Counties Thrift Co. v. RairdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Vitrano v. Westgate Sea Products Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- McNew v. MulcahyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.