Warren v. Hopkins
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs brought an action upon a contract made by them with the defendant Hopkins, for grading outside land blocks 664 and 665 in San Francisco, and to enforce a lien upon the land for such grading, and subsequently brought another action upon a contract made by them with the defendants Hopkins and Bowie, for grading the streets in front of said blocks, and to enforce a lien therefor upon the same land. The appellant, Loupe, held a mortgage upon *508block 664, executed to him. by the defendant .Hopkins subsequent to the date of the contract for grading the blocks, and, for that reason, was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Boyd v. BurrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Boston v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In re Estate of MedburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Woodside v. HewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Blood Relatives of Hill v. Blood Relatives of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hendrickson v. BertelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.