Legal Opinion

Jaques v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1913No. Civ. No. 1154PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The court below, upon motion of the defendants, dismissed the proceedings in certiorari directed against said defendants, the ultimate object of the writ being to secure a decree anulling and setting aside as void all the proceedings of the defendant, board of supervisors, culminating in the formation of the defendant, Reclamation District No. 784, situated in Yuba County. The complaint specifically refers to the several proceedings of said board of supervisors leading to the formation of said reclamation district and makes them a part thereof. The defendants each demurred to the complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Woodside v. HewelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boehm v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Crocker v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. North v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API