Legal Opinion

North v. Evans

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1931No. Docket No. 875PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Motion by respondent to dismiss an appeal. The motion is made on the ground that the appellant did not file with this court points and authorities within the time prescribed by the provisions of section 4 of rule I of the rules of this court. The transcript was filed on March 25, 1931. The time within which appellant was permitted to file her opening brief expired therefore on April 24, 1931. Notice of the presentation of this motion was served on counsel for appellant on April 27, 1931, and was filed on the same date. The motion was noticed for presentation on May 12, 1931, and was presented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Tyner v. AxtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Jaques v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Fishman v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Righetti v. Monroe, Lyon & Miller, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. KrummCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Childress v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API