Legal Opinion

Caplan v. CNA Short Term Disability Plan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 1, 2007No. C06-05865 CWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT HARTFORD’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND CLAIM FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF

WILKEN, District Judge.

Defendant Hartford Life Group Insurance Company (Hartford) moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the second claim in Plaintiffs first amended complaint. 1 Plaintiffs second claim is for in-junctive or other equitable relief against Defendant Hartford pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Plaintiff opposes the motion. The matter was decided on the papers. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties on the motion, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zisk v. Gannett Co. Income Protection PlanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  2. Doe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. Englert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API