Legal Opinion
Zisk v. Gannett Co. Income Protection Plan
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 6, 2014No. Case No. 14-cv-00391-YGRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Motion To Dismiss Second Cause Op Action
Re: Dkt. No. 19. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, United States District Judge
Plaintiff John Zisk (“Zisk”) filed suit bringing two causes of action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. The first cause of action seeks to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits from the Gan-nett Company Income Protection Plan (“the Plan”) pursuant to section 1132(a)(1)(B). The second cause of action is brought pursuant section 1132(a)(3) against Defendant Life Insurance Company of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Paulsen v. CNF INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schuman v. Microchip Tech. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Del Prete v. Magellan Behavioral Health, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
- Laird v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
- Chapin v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.