Legal Opinion

Englert v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 13, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-04814-HSGPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 20

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff Peter Englert’s second claim for relief. Dkt. No. 20. Having considered Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs opposition, and all related papers, the Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-l(b). For the reasons articulated below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hancock v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017
  2. ADVANCED ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  3. Cleanquest, LLC v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  4. D. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API