Legal Opinion
Doe v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 12, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-01031-EMC; Docket Nos. 87, 89, 97, 113PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs bring this putative class action alleging that they have been discriminatorily denied benefits under their employer-offered prescription drug benefit plans. The complaint names two sets of defendants: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, LLC., and Caremark California Specialty Pharmacy, LLC (collectively "CVS"), and Amtrak, Lowe's Companies, and Time Warner, Inc. (collectively "Employer Defendants"). CVS contracted with Employer Defendants to provide prescription drug benefits to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that their benefit plans allow them…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alec Otto v. Nano f/k/a Raiblocks f/k/a Hieusys LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Church Ekklasia Sozo, Inc. v. CVS Health CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Metaxas v. Gateway Bank F.S.B.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Smith v. Cigna Health & Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Vang v. Geil Enterprises Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.