Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 27, 1985No. 84-9PublishedCited by 1,909 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented for decision is whether, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a fiduciary to an employee benefit plan may be held personally liable to a plan participant or beneficiary for extra-contractual compensatory or punitive damages caused by improper or untimely processing of benefit claims.

Respondent Doris Russell, a claims examiner for petitioner Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereafter petitioner), is a beneficiary under two employee benefit plans administered by petitioner for eligible employees. Both plans are funded from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,909 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

1,904 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API