Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The question presented for decision is whether, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), a fiduciary to an employee benefit plan may be held personally liable to a plan participant or beneficiary for extra-contractual compensatory or punitive damages caused by improper or untimely processing of benefit claims.
Respondent Doris Russell, a claims examiner for petitioner Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (hereafter petitioner), is a beneficiary under two employee benefit plans administered by petitioner for eligible employees. Both plans are funded from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,909 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
1,904 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.