Morse v. Tochterman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County and from an order refusing a new trial. Clarence A. Raker, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action to recover the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars which is alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiffs for rent under the terms of a lease, whereby the latter demised to the former certain premises situated in Alturas, Modoc County, for the term of two years, at the monthly rental of fifty dollars, payable in advance on the first day of each month during the continuance of the term.
The complaint, states that the lease was executed on the twenty-ninth day of April, 1910 -, that, on or about the first day of June, 1910, the defendants entered into the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Skally v. ShutsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- De Witt v. PiersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Williams v. Ashurst Oil, Land, & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Automobile, Truck, Tractor & Implement Co. v. SalladayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Jones-Mclaughlin, Inc. v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Woolford v. Electric Appliances, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Matyasovich v. PetriccianiNevada Supreme Court · 1941