Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ashurst Oil, Land, & Development Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1904No. Sac. No. 1189PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to compel the specific performance of a contract made by defendant with plaintiff’s assignor" for the delivery of sixty-five hundred shares of the capital stock of defendant, in payment for a conveyance made by plaintiff’s assignor to defendant of the oil in certain lands. Findings were filed and judgment ordered that plaintiff is entitled to receive from defendant “six thousand five hundred shares of the capital stock of said corporation of the class designated as ‘pool stock’ upon the delivery to said corporation by said plaintiff for cancellation to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Tennant v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Crawford v. FranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Gruen Watch Co. v. Artists Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API