Automobile, Truck, Tractor & Implement Co. v. Salladay
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J., pro tem.
This case involves an alleged forfeiture of a lease of a Nash touring- car. The respondents, by an instrument in writing, on March 18, 1919, leased to appellant the car in question for an agreed rental of $1,720, payable as follows: $270 in cash, $700 in two months and the balance in monthly installments of $62.50. It is provided in the lease that there should .be a monthly payment of $62.50 on May 18th, making the payment for that date $762.50; but both the complaint and answer show that this provision is a mistake and that only $700 was to be paid on that date. It is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Skaggs v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Holly v. HeiskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Heilbron v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Giraud v. MilovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Moore v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.