Legal Opinion

Matyasovich v. Petricciani

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1941No. 3270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Taber, J.:

Appellant and respondent were plaintiff and defendant, respectively, in the trial court; they will sometimes be so designated herein.

Respondent is the owner of the premises in which he conducts a gambling and liquor establishment known as the Palace Bar, or Palace Club, in the city of Reno. On May 31, 1935, appellant took a five-year lease on the rear portion of said club, went into possession on the following day and conducted a restaurant business there until June 15, 1936. The agreed rental for the five-year term was $11,400, to be paid in sixty monthly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Hahn v. MackayOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Huntington Easy Payment Co. v. ParsonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Tregoning v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Coen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Barfield v. DamonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API