Matyasovich v. Petricciani
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Taber, J.:
Appellant and respondent were plaintiff and defendant, respectively, in the trial court; they will sometimes be so designated herein.
Respondent is the owner of the premises in which he conducts a gambling and liquor establishment known as the Palace Bar, or Palace Club, in the city of Reno. On May 31, 1935, appellant took a five-year lease on the rear portion of said club, went into possession on the following day and conducted a restaurant business there until June 15, 1936. The agreed rental for the five-year term was $11,400, to be paid in sixty monthly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hodges v. A. P. Fries & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1894
- Hahn v. MackayOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Huntington Easy Payment Co. v. ParsonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
- Tregoning v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Coen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Collins v. Union Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Barfield v. DamonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952