Jones-Mclaughlin, Inc. v. Kelly
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLZER, J., pro tem.
Defendants appeal from a judgment awarded to plaintiff for the contract price of certain machinery, sold and installed by the latter at a certain oil-well.
It is conceded that the parties entered into a contract whereby the respondent was to sell and install a certain electric motor and compressor on the appellants’ well, that the parties intended that there should be a thirty-day test on this compressor following the installation, that on May 31, 1926, respondent completed the installation of said machinery, the same being attached to a concrete foundation imbedded in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Wristen v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Williams v. Ashurst Oil, Land, & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Atma v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Weisz Trucking Co. v. Emil R. Wohl ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Branch v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.