Legal Opinion

Jones-Mclaughlin, Inc. v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1929No. Docket No. 6230PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLZER, J., pro tem.

Defendants appeal from a judgment awarded to plaintiff for the contract price of certain machinery, sold and installed by the latter at a certain oil-well.

It is conceded that the parties entered into a contract whereby the respondent was to sell and install a certain electric motor and compressor on the appellants’ well, that the parties intended that there should be a thirty-day test on this compressor following the installation, that on May 31, 1926, respondent completed the installation of said machinery, the same being attached to a concrete foundation imbedded in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Niles v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Wristen v. BowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Williams v. Ashurst Oil, Land, & Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Atma v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Weisz Trucking Co. v. Emil R. Wohl ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Branch v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API