Kreuzberger v. Wingfield
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
— Action to recover an alleged balance for work done .aud materials furnished by plaintiff to defendant in the construction of a sidewalk in the city of Sacramento. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the superior court, and the defendant appeals.
The claim made by the plaintiff in the court below was, in substance, that by the terms of his contract he was to erect a wooden and cement sidewalk for .defendant, with a brick bulk-head around its outer edge, the portion on Eighth Street to be made of new lumber, except that the old posts were to be used as supports for it, *254the new lumber to be of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brigg v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Brink v. . Hanover Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re the Estate of TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Conner v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by30 opinions
- United Iron Works v. Outer Harbor Dock & Wharf Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Barnhart Aircraft, Inc. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Nolan v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.