Legal Opinion
Sivers v. Sivers
California Supreme Court
Decided March 11, 1893No. 15145PublishedCited by 54 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the . city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendants executed to the plaintiff the following instrument in consideration of the loan to them by the plaintiff of the sum of three hundred dollars:—•
“San Francisco, January 26, 1889.
“ The undersigned agreement entered into between J. H. Sivers, of San Francisco, and John Sivers and Eliza Sivers, his wife, that the said John Sivers and Eliza Sivers do jointly and severally agree to pay to the said *520John H. Sivers the sum of three hundred ($300) dollars advanced or loaned to us, or any further sum of money which he may loan to us at such time as circumstances may occur, — that is to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by54 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.