Paradiso v. Drake
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 Jeanne E. Drake agreed to sell “as is” nine vacant lots to John Paradiso’s Living Trust (Trust). Drake refused to close the sale because a neighbor’s septic drain field encumbered one of the lots and the proposed warranty deed did not contain the “as is” language present in the original sales agreement. The Trust sued for specific performance, and the trial court granted the Trust summary judgment. On appeal, Drake argues that she could not close because she could not convey clear title to the lots. In the alternative, she asserts that even if she breached the purchase and sale agreement,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Kruse v. HempWashington Supreme Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Grant County Port District No. 9 v. Washington Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Brotherson v. Professional Basketball Club, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Hanson Industries, Inc. v. KutschkauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.