Legal Opinion

Overton v. Consolidated Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2002No. 70562-3PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

This proceeding arises out of two comprehensive general liability policies purchased on behalf of an electrical transformer manufacturing and repair business. After suit was commenced by the current owners of the site for contribution of cleanup costs under the Model Toxics Control Act, chapter 70.105D RCW, the insureds tendered defense to their insurers. When both insurers rejected the tender, the insureds sued, claiming breach of contract, bad faith denial of coverage, and violation of the Consumer Protection Act, chapter 19.86 RCW. The ultimate question is whether an existing contamination…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Van T. Junkins and Associates, Inc., an Alabama Corporation v. U.S. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Smith v. Safeco InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Quadrant Corp. v. American States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API