Legal Opinion

Bloor v. Fritz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 1, 2008No. 35740-2-IIPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Eddie and Eva Bloor purchased a home from Robert and Charmaine Fritz through Lance Miller, an agent at LC Realty, Inc. After learning that the home was contaminated by a methamphetamine lab, the Bloors sued the Fritzes; Miller; LAM Management, Inc.; LC Realty; and Cowlitz County.1 The trial court found that the Fritzes negligently misrepresented the condition of the property and that Miller failed to disclose a known material fact about the property and negligently misrepresented its condition, thereby violating the Consumer Protection Act (Act), chapter 19.86 RCW. Miller and LC Realty…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Colorado Coffee Bean, LLC v. Peaberry Coffee Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. King v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API