Legal Opinion

Hanson Industries, Inc. v. Kutschkau

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 16, 2010No. Nos. 27315-6-III; 27600-7-III; 27718-6-III; 27723-2-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRulik, C.J.

f 1 The central controversy here is a dispute between private parties over the ownership of a water permit application. In 1995, property owners Orvis and Elaine Kutschkau sold their property, known as the U&I Sugar Plant, to Hanson Industries Inc. (Hanson).1 Prior to the sale, the Kutschkaus filed a permit application with the Department of Ecology (Department) to withdraw artificially stored ground water (ASGW) from the Quincy Groundwater subarea.

¶2 Numerous disputes relating to this business relationship arose between the Kutschkaus and Hanson. The parties agreed to resolve all issues in a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Berrocal v. FernandezWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of MinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Custom Ag Service, Inc. v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Douglas Merino, Et Ux v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Ford Credit Services v. Raymond Brenneman & Valerie Brenneman, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Merino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API