Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*495¶1 We are asked to interpret the Joint Operating Agreement between the two daily metropolitan newspapers serving the greater Seattle area. We are told that our decision could lead to the closing of one of these newspapers. The advantages of having two great newspapers in our state’s largest city, each with an independent editorial and reportorial voice, are numerous and we do not address our task lightly. Our duty, however, is to interpret and apply the law.
Chambers, J.
¶2 The law of contracts is the same whether the parties are two publishing giants fighting for market control or two…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Citizen Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Trimble v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Viking Bank v. Firgrove Commons 3, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- P.E. Systems, LLC v. CPI Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Wilson v. Circle K Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.