Legal Opinion
Grant County Port District No. 9 v. Washington Tire Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 21, 2015No. 31673-4-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLawrence-Berrey, J.
¶1 Grant County Port District No. 9 (Port) and Washington Tire Corporation (WTC) entered into an earnest money agreement (EMA). Under this agreement, WTC agreed to purchase real property from the Port. Shortly before closing, the port commissioners voted to terminate the agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Port, concluding that the Port was entitled to repudiate the agreement. The trial court also held that WTC’s exclusive remedy under the EMA for the Port’s breach was rescission and return of its $40,000 earnest money. We hold that the Port was not entitled to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Seven Gables Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1944
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bessie Williams v. First TransitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Bodum Holding AG v. Starbucks CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- City Of Edmonds, V. The Edmonds Ebb Tide Assoc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- City of Union Gap v. Printing Press Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Foss Maritime Company, LLC, a Washington limited liability company; and Northwest Tug Leasing, LLC, a Washington limited liability company v. Navigators Insurance Company, a New York insurance company; Zurich American Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company; and Ascot Insurance Company a New York insurance companyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.