Legal Opinion

Kruse v. Hemp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1993No. 59573-9PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Petitioners Fred and Emma Hemp (Hemp) challenge a Court of Appeals decision holding that they waived their right to appeal the trial court's partial grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents Michael and Kay Kruse (Kruse) by accepting the benefits of that decision. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In April 1985, the parties executed a 5-year lease agreement for the premises located at 1611 North State Street, Bellingham, Washington. Kruse operates the Bellingham Chiropractic Center, Inc., P.S. (BCC, Inc.) at that location. The lease listed Hemp as lessor and BCC, Inc., as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ski Acres, Inc. v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Miller v. McCamishWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Scott v. Cascade StructuresWashington Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Elcon Construction, Inc. v. Eastern Washington UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API