Legal Opinion

Doe v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2000No. Docket 200810PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to MCR 7.215(H), a special panel has been convened to resolve a conflict between this case, Doe v Dep’t of Corrections, 236 Mich App 801 (1999), and Neal v Dep’t of Corrections (On Rehearing), 232 Mich App 730; 592 NW2d 370 (1998).

*201We find the reasoning found in the majority opinion in Neal and the concurrence in Doe, supra at 815, to be persuasive and consistent with established rules of statutory construction.

It has been argued that the Legislature could not have intended that the statutory prohibition against discrimination found in the Civil Rights Act (CRA), MCL 37.2101 et seq.;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neal v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Doe v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Key v. GraysonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  2. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. John Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Rose v. Saginaw CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API