Legal Opinion
Doe v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2015No. Docket 321013 and 321756PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RlORDAN, RJ.
Defendants, various governmental entities and individuals including the Department of Corrections and the Governor, originally sought leave to appeal the trial court orders denying their motions for summary disposition in this action initiated by plaintiffs, who are male prisoners.
In Docket No. 321013, defendants sought to appeal the trial court order denying their motion for summary *101disposition based on plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the prison litigation reform act (PLRA), MCL 600.5501 et seq. In Docket No. 321756, defendants sought to appeal the trial court order denying…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Agnes N Cramer v. Transitional Health Services of WayneMichigan Supreme Court · 2023
- Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- John Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- John Does 11-18 v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.