Legal Opinion
Key v. Grayson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 5, 2001No. CIV. 96-40166PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court are the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Donald Scheer [docket entry 273] and the objections and responses thereto. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e), the Court concludes that a hearing would not aid in the disposition of these matters. For the reasons set forth below, the Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation, except insofar as it pertains to Plaintiffs ability to: (1) bring suit against Defendants in their individual capacities pursuant to 42 U.S ,C. § 12203(a); (2) seek recovery for…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Lardie v. BirkettDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Tanney v. BolesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Horen v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF TOLEDO CITY SCH. DIST.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Gottschalk v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.