Legal Opinion

Payne v. Payne

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8010DC286PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff’s assignments of error all relate to the amount of alimony the court ordered defendant to pay to plaintiff. G.S. § 50-16.5(a) provides: “Alimony shall be in such amount as the circumstances render necessary, having due regard to the estates, earnings, earning capacity, condition, accustomed standard of living of the parties, and other facts of the particular case.” Although the trial judge must follow the requirements of this section in determining the amount of permanent alimony to be awarded, the trial judge’s determination of the proper amount is within his sound…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Cornelison v. CornelisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friend-Novorska v. NovorskaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Friend-Novorska v. NovorskaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Friend-Novorska v. NovorskaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API