Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7914DC245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant-wife first contends that there was error in the award of $1500.00 per month in alimony on the grounds that the *655trial court failed to consider the income tax consequences of the award; that it applied an improper standard in evaluating her expenses in light of the plaintiff’s income and estate; and that the court abused its discretion in failing to make provision for possession of the parties’ homeplace. We find no error in the award of permanent alimony.

G.S. 5046.5(a) provides: “Alimony shall be in such amount as the circumstances render necessary, having due regard to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eudy v. EudySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Sayland Ex Rel. McLendon v. SaylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Payne v. PayneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Gilbert v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Gebb v. GebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API