Legal Opinion · Dissent

Friend-Novorska v. Novorska

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 2001No. COA00-254Published

1DissentHudson, Judge

I do not believe the majority opinion fully addresses a number of crucial issues in this case. These issues are: (I) precisely which portions of the trial court’s original order were vacated, and which portions were left standing, by this Court in Friend-Novorska v. Novorska, 131 N.C. App. 867, 509 S.E.2d 460 (1998) (Friend-Novorska I); (II) the trial court’s failure to make a new award of alimony on remand; and (III) the trial court’s renewed failure to explain both the amount of alimony and the duration of the award on remand. For these reasons, I must dissent.

The trial court’s original…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tennessee-Carolina Transportation, Inc. v. Strick Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Anderson Chevrolet/Olds, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Lea Company v. Narth Carolina Bd. of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API