Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 9021DC1174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

At the time of the judgment of permanent alimony, the trial court found that the defendant, who was 68 years old and had health problems, owned the following assets:

[[Image here]]

Defendant had individual debts of $37,876.

The trial court found that defendant had the following monthly income:

[[Image here]]

Including the temporary alimony of $1684, the trial court found that defendant’s total gross monthly income was $3161. With taxes, the trial court found that defendant’s average net income per month *544was $2554.08. The trial court found that defendant’s total monthly expenses were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Cobb v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Beaman v. BeamanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Capps v. CappsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Almason v. AlmasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. BADROCK v. PickardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API